2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty. Anchor | green | “in the ordinary course a police officer is free to ask a person for identification without implicating the fourth amendment.” | 17 |
| 2 | Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado | green | “nterrogation relating to one's identity or a request for identification by the police does not, by itself, constitute a fourth amendment seizure.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.