6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smart v. Local 702 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smart v. Local 702 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Anchor | green | “a logical first step in analysis is determining whether the state claim is displaced by federal law under an ordinary preemption analysis.” | 5 |
| 2 | Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers | green | “a suit 8 no. 193142 'for violation of a contract'... is one filed because a contract has been violated” | 4 |
| 3 | Mohr v. Metro East Mfg. Co. | green | “the supreme court has opted for uniform rules for questions of contract formation” | 4 |
| 4 | National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Florida Hotel And Motel Association | green | “this clause notwithstanding, the union and the association created a valid and enforceable contract upon rank and file ratification.” | 4 |
| 5 | Frank H. Boomer, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. At & T Corporation, a New York Corporation | green | “the doctrine of field (also known as complete) preemption” | 4 |
| 6 | Baker v. Kingsley | green | “the federal statute will displace the statelaw claim to ensure uni form interpretation of collective bargaining agreements” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.