7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michigan v. Bryant.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michigan v. Bryant Anchor | green | “in making the primary purpose determination, standard rules of hearsay, designed to identify some statements as reliable, will be relevant.” | 5 |
| 2 | Nash v. State | green | “n cases such as the present one where injury occurs as the result of domestic violence, which may alter the course of diagnosis and treatment, trial courts may properly exercise their discretion in admitting statements regarding identity of the perpetrator.” | 4 |
| 3 | Moore v. City of Leeds | green | “we believe that the rationale 30 employed by the supreme court in would also apply to victims of domestic violence.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Newell | green | “although we base our decision on a different rationale, we find no reversible error in the trial court's ruling.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Hildreth | green | “scertaining the identity of the abuser is a matter that may assist in diagnosis or treatment of an emotional or psychological injury.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Tracy | green | “because of the nature of child sexual abuse, the only direct witnesses to the crime will often be the perpetrator and the victim. consequently, much of the state's proof will necessarily have to be admissible hearsay statements made by the victim to relatives and medical personn…” | 3 |
| 7 | State of Iowa v. Patrick Michael Dudley | green | “the child must make the statements to a trained professional for the purposes of diagnosis or treatment to be admissible under rule 5.803(4).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.