7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Guzman v. Allstate.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guzman v. Allstate Anchor | green | “how much weight to credit self-interested evidence is a question of credibility, which judges may not evaluate at the summary judgment stage.” | 5 |
| 2 | Seigler v. Wal-Mart Stores TX | green | “on summary judgment, all facts and reasonable inferences are construed in favor of the nonmovant, and the court should not weigh evidence or make credibility findings.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Smtc Mfg. of Texas | green | “he trustee bears the burden of proving all elements of his tufta claims by a preponderance of the evidence.” | 3 |
| 4 | In Re Smtc Mfg. of Texas | green | “proof that assets were transferred and an assessment of their value are essential to sustaining a fraudulent conveyance action the trustee bears the burden of proving all elements of his tufta claims by a preponderance of the evidence.” | 3 |
| 5 | In Re Pace | green | “under section 24.005, 'he trustee bears the burden of proof to show, by a preponderance of evidence, that the transfers in question were made by the debtor with the actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud any creditor of the debtor.” | 3 |
| 6 | In re 1701 Commerce, LLC | green | “texas law defines an 'asset' as 'property of a debtor,' but expressly excludes 'property to the extent it is encumbered by a valid lien.” | 3 |
| 7 | In re 1701 Commerce, LLC | green | “under texas law, a fraudulent transfer begins with a debtor either transferring an asset or incurring an obligation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.