3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board Anchor | green | “in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.” | 8 |
| 2 | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. O'Leary | green | “in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.” | 8 |
| 3 | Nebraska v. Hughes | green | “in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.