3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Romano v. Gibson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Romano v. Gibson Anchor | green | “this court can affirm the denial of habeas relief on whichever strickland prong is the easier to resolve.” | 10 |
| 2 | Steven Keith Hatch v. State of Oklahoma | green | “he allegations must be specific and particularized, not general or conclusory” | 7 |
| 3 | Steven Keith Hatch v. State of Oklahoma | green | “he allegations must be specific and particularized, not general or conclusory.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.