3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd. v. United States Anchor | green | “efore approving the application of a foia exemption, the district court must make specific findings of segregability regarding the documents to be withheld.” | 9 |
| 2 | Trans-Pacific Policing Agreement v. United States Customs Service | green | “e believe that the district court had an affirmative duty to consider the segregability issue sua sponte . . . even if the issue has not been specifically raised by the foia plaintiff.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.