7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt Anchor | green | “courts are free to base their findings on commonsense inferences drawn from the evidence.” | 4 |
| 2 | A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Scott C. Newman, Prosecuting Attorney for Marion County Indiana, on Behalf of a Class of Prosecutors | green | “indiana is entitled to an opportunity to have its law evaluated in light of experi- ence in indiana.” | 3 |
| 3 | Zbaraz v. Madigan | green | “where fairly possible, courts should construe a statute to avoid a danger of unconstitutionality.” | 3 |
| 4 | Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van Hollen | green | “it is not a matter of the number of women likely to be affected.” | 3 |
| 5 | Obergefell v. Hodges | green | “he right to personal choice regarding marriage is inherent in the concept of individual autonomy.” | 3 |
| 6 | Planned Parenthood of Indiana & Kentucky, Inc. v. Commissioner, Indiana State Department of Health | green | “he law recognizes legitimate state interests in pro- tecting children and adolescents, preserving family integrity, and encouraging parental authority.” | 3 |
| 7 | Planned Parenthood of Indiana & Kentucky, Inc. v. Commissioner, Indiana State Department of Health | green | “protecting children and adolescents, preserving family integrity, and encouraging pa- rental authority” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.