7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Fernandez-Torres – (.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Fernandez-Torres – ( Anchor | green | “voluntariness ultimately must be determined holistically.” | 4 |
| 2 | Swann v. Commonwealth | green | “swann, a high school graduate who had attended one semester of college, was no stranger to the judicial system.” | 3 |
| 3 | MacE v. Amestoy | green | “the petitioner could not possibly assess the likelihood of prosecution which is totally dependent upon the discretion of the state's attorney.” | 3 |
| 4 | IN RE S.W. | green | “we reinforce the necessity of looking holistically at every custodial interrogation in reaching a conclusion specific to the facts presented.” | 3 |
| 5 | IN RE S.W. | green | “e take great care to assess the impact of subtle interrogation tactics.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Joshua Riley | green | “exceptions to this general rule arise in certain situations that are viewed as inherently coercive.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Baker. | green | “crucially, a court must not analyze the individual circumstances in isolation, but must weigh - 18 - those circumstances in their totality.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.