7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sprint Nextel Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sprint Nextel Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission Anchor | green | “when the commission failed to within the statutory period, congress's decision-not the agency's-took effect.” | 3 |
| 2 | Prometheus Radio Project v. Federal Communications Commission | green | “because we vacate the nbco rule in the 2008 order, the rule in existence prior to that order will remain in effect until the fcc promulgates new cross-ownership regulations.” | 3 |
| 3 | Black Oak Energy, LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “although we remand, we do so without vacating . . . we deem it better to preserve the status quo as ferc reconsiders” | 3 |
| 4 | New Jersey Board of Public Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “ferc . . . conclud that the exemption needed to be eliminated due to 'mounting evidence of risk from what was previously only a theoretical weakness in the mopr rules,' namely, that state-subsidized resources would suppress auction prices.” | 3 |
| 5 | Hughes v. Talen Energy Marketing, LLC | green | “nothing in this opinion should be read to foreclose . . . states from encouraging production of new or clean generation through measures 'untethered to a generator's wholesale market participation.” | 3 |
| 6 | Public Citizen, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “section 205(a)'s statement concerning the unlawfulness of unjust and unreasonable rates does not rise to an inexorable command like that found in igra” | 3 |
| 7 | Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “t is within the scope of the agency's expertise to make . . . a prediction about the market it regulates, and a reasonable prediction deserves our deference notwithstanding that there might also be another reasonable view.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.