7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard Black v. Herbert D. Brown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard Black v. Herbert D. Brown Anchor | green | “the claim for injunctive relief is, of course, mooted by plaintiff's release from isolation and segregation.” | 3 |
| 2 | Armando Colon v. Thomas Howard | green | “in cases challenging shu confinements of durations within the range bracketed by 101 days and 305 days, development of a detailed record will as- sist appellate review” | 3 |
| 3 | J.S. v. T'Kach | green | “confinement of 188 days is a significant enough hardship" to create a liberty interest "n the absence of factual findings to the con- trary” | 3 |
| 4 | Townsend v. Fuchs | green | “indeed, there is nothing 'atypical' about discretionary segregation; discretionary segregation is instead an 'ordinary incident of prison life' that inmates should expect to experience during their time in prison.” | 3 |
| 5 | Maurice Hardaway v. Brett Meyerhoff | green | “although relatively short terms of segregation rarely give rise to a prisoner's liberty interest, at least in the absence of exceptionally harsh conditions, such an interest may arise from a long term of confinement combined with atypical and significant hardships.” | 3 |
| 6 | Charles Hamner v. Danny Burls | green | “hamner is no longer in no. 23-1703 33 administrative segregation, and he concedes that his claim for injunctive relief is moot.” | 3 |
| 7 | Courtney Ealy v. Cameron Watson | green | “five months in segregation, standing alone, is not enough to implicate a liberty interest” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.