4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Dalton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Dalton Anchor | green | “the prohibition against ex post facto laws applies only to laws that are punitive. it does not apply to fees, which are compensatory instead of punitive.” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Schmalz | green | “the rule that possession must be exclusive does not mean that the possession may not be joint .” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Delgado | green | “the minimum this court has required for the affirmance of a conviction for delivery involving small amounts of drugs is possession of the controlled substance packaged for sale, plus at least one additional factor indicative of delivery .” | 4 |
| 4 | The PEOPLE v. Nettles | green | “where narcotics are found on premises under defendant's control, it may be inferred that the defendant had both knowledge and control of the narcotics” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.