7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Wilkinson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Wilkinson Anchor | green | “the basic elements of procedural due process are notice and an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.” | 3 |
| 2 | State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Meneley | green | “when faced with an affidavit of prejudice filed pursuant to k.s.a. 20-311d, this court has unlimited review, and on appeal must decide the legal sufficiency of the affidavit and not the truth of the facts alleged.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Quartez Brown | green | “the duty to inquire accrues when the court first learns of the potential conflict, and that duty does not decay or dissipate just because a pro se defendant fails to give the court multiple reminders of its duty throughout the proceedings.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Sawyer | green | “we judge the adequacy of due process under a de novo standard of appellate review.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Stovall | green | “we have no hesitation in specifically stating that the trial court's failure to appropriately deal with defense counsel's declared conflicts of interest was an abuse of discretion.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Bowen | green | “bowen's claim that k.s.a. 2013 supp. 60-455 is subject to the limitation on admission of propensity evidence in subsection has been expressly rejected.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Waller | green | “appellate courts reviewing the second part for an injustice may take a broader view than the trial court because appellate courts may examine the entire record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.