Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 186 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michael Hayes v. Idaho Correctional Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael Hayes v. Idaho Correctional Center Anchor | green | “if it 19 appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which 20 would entitle him to relief.” | 94 |
| 2 | Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration Association | green | “allegations that 15 give rise to an enforceable right to relief.” | 92 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.