7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Gary F. Lemberger.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Gary F. Lemberger Anchor | green | “uffice it to say that lemberger does not adequately establish that article i, section 11 possesses a different meaning than the fourth amendment to the united states constitution in this context.” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Simpson | green | “colorado's expressed consent statute imposes only civil, and not criminal, penalties for refusal. therefore, . . . birchfield sanctions rather than forbids justifying a warrantless blood draw on the basis of statutory consent.” | 3 |
| 3 | State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon III | green | “his proposition does not mean a choice between two unpalatable alternatives can never be coercive.” | 3 |
| 4 | State of Iowa v. Carson Michael Walker | green | “most of our cases, however, have involved the statutory right to place a telephone call to an attorney or family member when pulled over for drunk driving.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Harris | green | “onsent is not invalid under the fourth amendment simply because it was given in advance and in exchange for a related benefit, and this is all the implied consent law accomplishes.” | 3 |
| 6 | Voss v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division | green | “the clear intent of is to provide a person who has been requested to submit a chemical test a basis for evaluation and decision-making in regard to either submitting or not submitting to the test.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Padley | green | “the fact that the driver is forced to make a difficult choice does not render the consent involuntary.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.