4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ludwig v. Massachusetts.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ludwig v. Massachusetts Anchor | green | “the supreme court has instructed that the sixth and fourteenth amendments do not require a unanimous verdict in state criminal prosecutions” | 5 |
| 2 | Danforth v. Minnesota | green | “teague . . . situated the rule it announced in th line of cases adjusting the scope of fed- eral habeas relief in accordance with equitable and pruden- tial considerations” | 5 |
| 3 | Konolus Smith v. Garry Swarthout | green | “the supreme court has instructed that the sixth and fourteenth amendments do not require a unanimous verdict in state criminal prosecutions” | 5 |
| 4 | Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC | green | “respecting stare decisis means sticking to some wrong decisions” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.