7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from R.K. v. Ramirez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R.K. v. Ramirez Anchor | green | “the basis for the privileges is twofold: (1) to encourage the full communication necessary for effective treatment, . . . and (2) to prevent unnecessary disclosure of highly personal information.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Heirs of Charles Zanco | green | “when the state of texas enters its courts as a litigant, it must be held subject to the same rules that govern other litigants” | 4 |
| 3 | R.K. v. Ramirez | green | “even when a document includes some information meeting this standard, any information not meeting this standard remains privileged and must be redacted or otherwise protected.” | 3 |
| 4 | Groves v. Gabriel | green | “however, a trial court's order compelling release of medical records should be restrictively drawn so as to maintain the privilege with respect to records or communications not relevant to the underlying suit.” | 3 |
| 5 | Security Trust Co. v. Lipscomb County | green | “when the state becomes a party to a suit it is subject to the same rules that govern other parties and a judgment for or against it must be given the same effect as would be given if it were an individual litigant.” | 3 |
| 6 | in Re State of Texas | green | “here the legislature has given no indication to the contrary the state must abide by the same rules to which private litigants are beholden” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.