Topic: suit against a state official in his or her official capaci… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #154

7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 148 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Will v. Michigan Department of State Police.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Will v. Michigan Department of State Police Anchor
scotus · 1989
green “suit against a state official in his or her official capacity is not a suit against the official but rather is a suit against the official's office. as such, it is no different from a suit against the state itself.” 48
2 Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, Intervenor
ca3 · 2002
green “when a plaintiff does not seek leave to amend a deficient complaint after a defendant moves to dismiss it, the court must inform the plaintiff that leave to amend within a set period of time, unless amendment would be inequitable or futile.” 26
3 Jones v. State
txed · 1995
green “an affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis is sufficient if it states that one cannot, because of poverty, afford to pay for the costs of litigation and still provide for him- or herself and any dependents.” 26
4 Rewolinski v. Morgan
wied · 1995
green “an affidavit demonstrating that the petitioner cannot, because of his poverty, provide himself and any dependents with the necessities of life is sufficient.” 20
5 Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc.
ca3 · 2007
green “n civil rights cases district courts must offer amendment- irrespective of whether it is requested-when dismissing a case for failure to state a claim unless doing so would be inequitable or futile.” 14
6 Lisa Michelle Lambert v. Charlotte Blackwell, Mrs., Superintendent the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
ca3 · 1998
green “the exhaustion requirement does not foreclose federal relief, but merely postpones it.” 9
7 Rewolinski v. Morgan
wied · 1995
green “an affidavit demonstrating that the petitioner cannot, because of poverty, provide and any dependents with the necessities of life is sufficient.” 5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check