2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Manhattan Jeep Chrysler Dodge, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Manhattan Jeep Chrysler Dodge, Inc. Anchor | green | “section 502 of the bankruptcy code provides generally that a proof of claim should be allowed except to the extent it is objectionable on various grounds.” | 11 |
| 2 | Keiler v. Harlequin Enterprises Ltd. | green | “o survive a motion under rule 12(b)(6), a complaint does not need to contain detailed or elaborate factual allegations, but only allegations sufficient to raise an entitlement to relief above the speculative level.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.