3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rhode Island v. Innis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rhode Island v. Innis Anchor | green | “he special procedural safeguards outlined in miranda are required not where a suspect is simply taken into custody, but rather where a suspect in custody is subjected to interrogation.” | 12 |
| 2 | Harold S. Alston v. Walter Redman, Warden Charles M. Oberly, Iii, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and the State of Delaware | green | “the antipathy expressed in mcneil towards the anticipatory invocation of the miranda rights is consistent with miranda's underlying principles. the miranda right to counsel is a prophylactic rule that does not operate independent from the danger it seeks to protect against” | 3 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Sherwood | green | “since was not in custody when he made his statement about a lawyer, his alleged invocation of his right to counsel had no fifth amendment effect” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.