4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 141 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Keeling v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Inst..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keeling v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Inst. Anchor | green | “keeling's pro se status and lack of knowledge of the law are not sufficient to constitute an extraordinary circumstance and excuse his late filing.” | 67 |
| 2 | Charmel Allen v. Joan N. Yukins, Warden | green | “gnorance of the law alone is not sufficient to warrant equitable tolling.” | 58 |
| 3 | Nelson Cobas v. Mary Burgess | green | “an inmate's lack of legal training, his poor education, or even his illiteracy does not give a court reason to toll the statute of limitations” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.