6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 141 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Krull v. Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krull v. Colvin Anchor | green | “krull's disagreement is with the alj's weighing of the evidence, but the deferential standard of review prevents us from reweighing it.” | 100 |
| 2 | Schillo v. Kijakazi | green | “we may vacate the agency's disability determination only if it is based on legal error or unsupported by 'substantial evidence'- that is, if no reasonable factfinder could have reached the same conclusion as the alj.” | 17 |
| 3 | Camille v. Colvin | green | “the alj used dr. kamin's opinion as the basis for the rfc but incorporated additional limitations based on, inter alia, the testimony of camille that she credited. an alj may accept parts of a doctor's opinion and reject others.” | 13 |
| 4 | Monroe v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “e agree that any such error was harmless, since monroe has not identified any prejudice and the record establishes that the error did not affect the alj's decision.” | 5 |
| 5 | Krull v. Colvin | green | “disagreement is with the alj's weighing of the evidence, but the deferential standard of review prevents us from reweighing it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.