3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of Austin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of Austin Anchor | green | “when a trial court's order granting summary judgment does not specify the grounds relied upon, the reviewing court must affirm summary judgment if any of the summary judgment grounds are meritorious.” | 9 |
| 2 | Employers Casualty Co. v. Transport Insurance Co. | green | “he claim here is for a pro rata part of the sums paid in settlement of the suit against the insured and as expenses in defending the suit.” | 5 |
| 3 | Traders & General Insurance v. Hicks Rubber Co. | green | “when refused to further assist in the defense of the . . . suit, shouldered the entire burden, including the appeals . . . . in so doing it paid out more than two-thirds of the costs and expenses incurred.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.