3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co. Anchor | green | “s is always the case when an issue is committed to judicial discretion, the judge's decision must be supported by a circumstance that has relevance to the issue at hand” | 6 |
| 2 | Vicki Linneman v. Vita-Mix Corp. | green | “this circuit uses the 'community market rule' to calculate a reasonable billing rate.” | 6 |
| 3 | Robert Stallworth v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority David Vegh and Ronald Tober | green | “district court, after issuing an order of remand, may make an award of attorney fees and costs in a separate order.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.