3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na Llc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na Llc Anchor | green | “to avoid saddling defendants with the burden of investigating jurisdictional facts, we have held that 'the ground for removal must be revealed affirmatively in the initial pleading in order for the first -day clock under 1446(b) to begin.” | 8 |
| 2 | Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na Llc | green | “efendants need not make extrapolations or engage in guesswork ; yet the statute 'requires a defendant to apply a reasonable amount of intelligence in ascertaining removability.” | 5 |
| 3 | Gusse v. Damon Corp. | green | “ourts must look to state substantive law to determine the remedies for breach of an express warranty.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.