4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. Anchor | green | “he familiar rule that the stockholder's interest in the is subordinate to the rights of creditors. . . . ny arrangement of the parties by which the subordinate rights secured at the expense of . . . creditors comes within judicial denunciation.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re Ppi Enterprises | green | “creditor's claim outside of bankruptcy is not the relevant barometer for impairment; we must examine whether the plan itself is a source of limitation on . . . rights.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Dow Corning Corp. | green | “ince 502(b)(2) speaks only to claim allowance . . ., does not rule out the possibility of interest on allowed claims pursuant to 1129(b).” | 4 |
| 4 | Ultra Petro Corp v. Ad Hoc Com | green | “he traditional solvent-debtor exception compels payment of the make-whole amount” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.