2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hilton v. Braunskill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hilton v. Braunskill Anchor | green | “he standard under the hilton factors is not mere prejudice: it is irreparable injury.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Judicial Watch, Inc. | green | “he public has a strong interest in the prompt completion of tax audits and investigations.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.