Topic: where evidence is susceptible to more than one rational int… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #187

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 126 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security Anchor
ca9 · 2005
green “where evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation, it is the alj's conclusion that must be upheld.” 57
2 Wanda S. FLATEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
ca9 · 1995
green “if the evidence can reasonably support either affirming or reversing the secretary's conclusion, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the secretary.” 31
3 Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
ca9 · 2005
green “we may reverse the alj's decision to deny benefits only if it is based upon legal error or is not supported by substantial evidence.” 24
4 Silva Tonapetyan v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
ca9 · 2001
green “although a treating physician's opinion is generally afforded the greatest weight in disability cases, it is not binding on an alj with respect to the existence of an impairment or the ultimate determination of disability.” 14

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check