Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 7,098 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board Anchor | green | “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 2,624 |
| 2 | Pierce v. Underwood | green | “does not mean a large or considerable amount of evidence, but rather such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 1,024 |
| 3 | Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission | green | “something less than the weight of the evidence, and the possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the alj's decision from being supported by substantial evidence.” | 940 |
| 4 | Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “a clear and satisfactory explication of the basis on which it rests.” | 692 |
| 5 | Ficca v. Astrue | green | “the court has plenary review of all legal issues . . . .” | 538 |
| 6 | Burton v. Schweiker | green | “the secretary's determination as to the status of a claim requires the correct application of the law to the facts.” | 516 |
| 7 | Leslie v. Barnhart | green | “in determining if the commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence the court must scrutinize the record as a whole.” | 501 |
| 8 | Lisa Schaudeck v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | green | “the alj must indicate in his decision which evidence he has rejected and which he is relying on as the basis for his finding.” | 263 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.