Topic: ourts have repeatedly held that checks and bank records are… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1929

5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James D. Harris v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 James D. Harris v. United States Anchor
ca9 · 1969
green “ourts have repeatedly held that checks and bank records are not subject to the protection of the attorney-client privilege.” 3
2 In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. Appeal of United States of America
ca11 · 1987
green “an attorney who acts as his client's agent for receipt or disbursement of money or property to or from third parties is not acting in a legal capacity, and records of such transactions are not privileged.” 3
3 Westmoreland v. Mississippi
scotus · 1972
green “ourts have repeatedly held that checks and bank records are not subject to the protection of the attorney-client privilege.” 3
4 Municipal Court of East Los Angeles Judicial District v. Perrine
scotus · 1972
green “ourts have repeatedly held that checks and bank records are not subject to the protection of the attorney-client privilege.” 3
5 Kroft v. Cox
scotus · 1972
green “ourts have repeatedly held that checks and bank records are not subject to the protection of the attorney-client privilege.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check