5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lopez v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lopez v. State Anchor | green | “failure to provide an adequate record on appeal handicaps appellate review.” | 3 |
| 2 | Employers Insurance Co. of Nevada v. Chandler | green | “ourts must construe statutes to give meaning to all of their parts and language.” | 3 |
| 3 | Butler v. State | green | “very word, phrase, and provision of a statute is presumed to have meaning.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Plunkett | green | “constitutional question will not be determined unless clearly involved, and a decision thereon is necessary to a determination of the case.” | 3 |
| 5 | Stromberg v. Second Judicial District Court | green | “if the district court grants the application for treatment, it must suspend the proceedings and place the offender on probation” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.