3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Regency Advantage Ltd. Partnership v. Bingo Idea-Watauga, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Regency Advantage Ltd. Partnership v. Bingo Idea-Watauga, Inc. Anchor | green | “a judicial admission must be a clear, deliberate, and unequivocal statement.” | 6 |
| 2 | State v. Miguel | green | “a court should not second-guess a governmental unit's decision about the type of marker or safety device that is most appropriate.” | 5 |
| 3 | State Ex Rel. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Gonzalez | green | “ubsection (a)(2) requires the state to maintain traffic signs in a condition sufficient to perform their intended traffic-control function.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.