2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sourovelis v. City of Philadelphia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sourovelis v. City of Philadelphia Anchor | green | “he court concludes that neither 16257 nor reitz bars suit against the d.a.'s office under the circumstances of this case.” | 8 |
| 2 | Reitz v. County Of Bucks | green | “he bucks county district attorney's office is not an entity for purposes of 1983 liability.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.