4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hayes v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hayes v. State Anchor | green | “compliance with each step is not discretionary, and the proper remedy when the trial court fails to abide by its duty under the melbourne procedure is to reverse and remand for a new trial.” | 4 |
| 2 | Hayes v. State | green | “he proper remedy when the trial court fails to abide by its duty under the melbourne procedure is to reverse and remand for a new trial.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Slappy | red | “judge cannot merely accept the reasons proffered at face value, but must evaluate those reasons as he or she would weigh any disputed fact.” | 3 |
| 4 | Hayes v. State | green | “since the reason defense counsel offered was facially gender neutral, the trial court was then required to engage in step three-the genuineness analysis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.