4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Attorney General of New York v. Soto-Lopez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attorney General of New York v. Soto-Lopez Anchor | green | “freedom to travel throughout the united states has long been recognized as a basic right under the constitution.” | 4 |
| 2 | Hooper v. Bernalillo County Assessor | green | “the constitution will not tolerate a state benefit program that 'creates fixed, permanent distinctions ... between ... clas- ses of concededly bona fide residents, based on how long they have been in the state” | 3 |
| 3 | Wallace v. State | green | “violates the prohibition on ex post facto laws contained in the indiana constitution because it imposes bur- dens that have the effect of adding punishment beyond that which could have been imposed when crime was committed” | 3 |
| 4 | State of Indiana v. Scott Zerbe | green | “the significant responsibilities with respect to zerbe's registration are merely maintained across state lines, to be fulfilled where he currently lives and works” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.