2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hilary Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hilary Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLC Anchor | green | “why else would hackers break into a store's database and steal consumers' private information? presumably, the purpose of the hack is, sooner or later, to make fraudulent charges or assume those consumers' identities.” | 10 |
| 2 | Z Channel Limited Partnership v. Home Box Office, Inc. | green | “if is entitled to collect damages in the event that it succeeds on the merits, the case does not become moot even though declaratory and injunctive relief are no longer of any use.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.