3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. United States Anchor | green | “we hold that imposing an increased sentence under the residual clause of the armed career criminal act violates the constitution's guarantee of due process.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. Robert Earl Oliver | green | “precisely the same analytical framework applied by the courts in ascertaining the scope of a 'crime of violence' logically obtains with respect to the question of what kind of conduct comprises a 'violent felony' .” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Chance Rearden | green | “we allow challenges to the sentencing guidelines on vagueness grounds.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.