2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Three Rivers Center For Independent Living, Inc. v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Pittsburgh.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Three Rivers Center For Independent Living, Inc. v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Pittsburgh Anchor | green | “once the plaintiff establishes the existence of a federal right, there arises a rebuttable presumption that the right is enforceable through the remedy of 1983.” | 7 |
| 2 | Kanter v. Barella | green | “generally, a plaintiff will be given the opportunity to amend her complaint when there is an asserted defense of failure to state a claim.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.