2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stephanie Carlson v. CSX Transportation, Incorpora.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stephanie Carlson v. CSX Transportation, Incorpora Anchor | green | “employers are familiar with discrimination claims and know how to investigate them, so little information is required to put the employer on notice of these claims.” | 10 |
| 2 | Tamika Graham v. Board of Education of the City | green | “it is enough for a plaintiff to assert that she was treated worse because of protected characteristics. . . . whether she can prove this is a subject for a later stage of the litigation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.