2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carlson v. Green.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carlson v. Green Anchor | green | “bivens established that the victims of a constitutional violation by a federal agent have a right to recover damages against the official in federal court despite the absence of any statute conferring such a right.” | 9 |
| 2 | Schweiker v. Chilicky | green | “in , this court held that the victim of a fourth amendment violation by federal officers acting under color of their authority may bring suit for money damages against the officers in federal court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.