2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rose v. Clark.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rose v. Clark Anchor | green | “f the defendant had counsel and was tried by an impartial adjudicator, there is a strong presumption that any other errors that may have occurred are subject to harmless-error analysis.” | 9 |
| 2 | Yates v. Evatt | green | “e have the authority to make our own assessment of the harmlessness of a constitutional error in the first instance.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.