3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc. Anchor | green | “as briefed, the argument is terse, free of legal citation, and vague. it is therefore waived.” | 6 |
| 2 | Robert Hennings v. Harry Grafton, in Capacity as County Clerk | green | “it is not every election irregularity, however, which will give rise to a constitutional claim and an action under section 1983. mere violation of a state statute by an elec- tion official, for example, will not.” | 3 |
| 3 | John Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee | green | “when interpreting a state statute, we apply the same prin- ciples of statutory construction that a state court would ap- ply.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.