4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., Trustee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., Trustee Anchor | green | “at trial, the party objecting to a discharge has the burden of proving the objection. but once that party meets the initial burden by producing evidence establishing the basis for his objection, the burden shifts to the debtor to explain satisfactorily the loss.” | 3 |
| 2 | M.R. Toupin, Inc. v. Turpin (In Re Turpin) | green | “when a debtor makes numerous omissions in his statement of affairs and schedules, the omissions together may constitute a pattern demonstrating a reckless disregard for the truth.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bauman v. Post (In Re Post) | green | “a reckless disregard of both the serious nature of the information sought and the necessary attention to detail and accuracy in answering may rise to the level of fraudulent intent necessary to bar the discharge.” | 3 |
| 4 | Spence v. Hintze (In re Hintze) | green | “because it is rare to have direct proof of intent to hinder, delay or defraud, it is proper to infer intent from circumstantial evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.