4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Paul E. Black v. Tic Investment Corp. Stratton Georgoulis, Individually and James H. Slife, Individually.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paul E. Black v. Tic Investment Corp. Stratton Georgoulis, Individually and James H. Slife, Individually Anchor | green | “where new evidence is presented in a reply to a no. 19-1452 15 motion for summary judgment, the district court should not consider the new evidence without giving the movant an op- portunity to respond.” | 3 |
| 2 | Gager v. Dell Financial Services, LLC | green | “the tcpa is a remedial statute that was passed to protect consumers from unwanted automated telephone calls. ... as a result, we should interpret in 's favor any silence in the tcpa as to a revocation right.” | 3 |
| 3 | Ira Holtzman v. Gregory Turza | green | “each recipient must prove that his fax machine or computer received the fax” | 3 |
| 4 | Dr. Robert L. Meinders, D.C. v. UnitedHealthcare, Inc. | green | “the district court deprived meinders due pro- cess by entering judgment against him on law and facts to which he did not have a full and fair opportunity to re- spond” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.