3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Iva Woodford v. Community Action Agency Of Greene County, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iva Woodford v. Community Action Agency Of Greene County, Inc. Anchor | green | “he facial neutrality of a factor is a basis for retaining jurisdiction, not for yielding it.” | 6 |
| 2 | Mouchantaf v. INTERNATIONAL MODELING AND TALENT ASSOCIATION | green | “while the arizona action involves additional defendants not parties here, that fact does not render the proceedings non-parallel.” | 3 |
| 3 | Dalzell Management Co. v. Bardonia Plaza, LLC | green | “s the federal and state actions are based on the same underlying facts, there is some risk of an inconsistent result; this court could make a determination on common issues which might not bind the parties named only in the state court action.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.