Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 199 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Cline.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Cline Anchor | green | “whether the claims would be time barred if filed anew in the proper forum, whether the claims alleged are likely to have merit, and whether the claims were filed in good faith....” | 112 |
| 2 | Case v. Hatch | green | “the filing of a second or successive 2254 application is tightly constrained.” | 46 |
| 3 | Yellowbear v. Wyoming Attorney General | green | “section 2241 is a vehicle ... for attacking the execution of a sentence.” | 18 |
| 4 | Craig v. United States | green | “there is no statute of limitations for petitions invoking 2241.” | 12 |
| 5 | Shirley v. Davis | neutral | “the dismissal of a 2254 petition as time-barred is a decision on the merits for purposes of determining whether a subsequent petition is second or successive.” | 7 |
| 6 | Case v. Hatch | green | “before a court can consider a second claim, an applicant must first 'move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.