4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gerberding v. Munro.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gerberding v. Munro Anchor | green | “we are not swayed in our analysis of by the policy merits or demerits of term limits for officeholders” | 3 |
| 2 | Washington State Legislature v. State | green | “budget bill, by its nature, appropriates funds for a finite time period-two years.” | 3 |
| 3 | Gerberding v. Munro | green | “we are not swayed in our analysis of by the policy merits or demerits of term limits for officeholders” | 3 |
| 4 | Washington State Legislature v. State | green | “budget bill, by its nature, appropriates funds for a finite time period-two years.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.