2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matter of Beaubouef.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matter of Beaubouef Anchor | green | “it makes no difference that does not intend to injure his creditors when he makes a false statement. creditors are entitled to judge for themselves what will benefit, and what will prejudice, them.” | 7 |
| 2 | Sholdra v. Chilmark Financial LLP (In Re Sholdra) | green | “tatements with fraudulent intent-or reckless indifference to the truth . . . can be proven by circumstantial evidence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.