3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dombrowski v. Pfister.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dombrowski v. Pfister Anchor | green | “so long as the statute remains available to the state the threat of prosecutions of protected expression is a real and substantial one” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP) | green | “a plaintiff must allege that he has been or will in fact be perceptibly harmed by the challenged agency action, not that he can imagine circumstances in which he could be affected by the agency's action” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.