3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Furlough v. Cage (In Re Technicool Sys., Inc.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Furlough v. Cage (In Re Technicool Sys., Inc.) Anchor | green | “bankruptcy courts are not article iii creatures bound by traditional standing requirements.” | 5 |
| 2 | In Re Global Industrial Technologies, Inc. | green | “to object to the confirmation of a reorganization plan in bankruptcy court, a party must, in the first instance, meet the requirements for standing that litigants in all federal cases face under article iii of the constitution.” | 3 |
| 3 | NexPoint Advisors v. Pachulski Stang | green | “bankruptcy courts are not authorized by article iii of the constitution, and as such are not presumptively bound by traditional rules of judicial standing.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.