2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation Anchor | green | “we have eschewed imposing overly rigorous requirements of expertise and have been satisfied with more generalized qualifications.” | 8 |
| 2 | Charles Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc. | green | “whether the appellants' expert might have done a better job is not the test.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.